Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
Dividend All-Stars (Fall 2016)

The grim spectre of stagnation is reaching out from the grave of economics to drag down interest rates across the world. The yield on long-term Canadian government bonds has fallen to a mere 1.8%, but that's sky high compared to the negative yields seen in Japan and parts of Europe.

It's no wonder that investors are fleeing bonds and heading to the high seas of the stock market instead. They're prepared to ride the market swells, and weather its storms, in the hopes of earning more than a dram of income over the long term.

We're here to offer a steady hand on the tiller with this year's Dividend All-Stars, which steers investors to the best income-generating stocks in the land. It marks the tenth anniversary of the strategy, which has profitably navigated through some big storms along the way.

Our top stocks steamed ahead since last time. The A-graded stocks gained 14% on average over the last year while the A-and-B stocks climbed by an average of 13%. In comparison, the S&P/TSX Composite ETF (XIC), which tracks the broad Canadian stock market, advanced 11% and the dividend-oriented iShares Canadian Select Dividend ETF (XDV) gained 11% over the same period.

We're pleased to say that our efforts have also been highly profitable over the long term. If you had purchased an equal dollar amount of each A-graded stock in your RRSP and rolled the proceeds into the new ones each year, you'd have gained a total of 148% since we started way back in 2007. Similarly, a portfolio of A-and-B stocks would have climbed 88%. By way of comparison, the S&P/TSX Composite Index ETF (XIC) logged a return of 39% over the same period and the dividend-oriented iShares Canadian Select Dividend ETF (XDV) advanced 50%. (The returns above include periodically reinvested dividends.)

While our method provided an extra edge, we weren't surprised by the outperformance of Canadian dividend stocks because market studies have extolled their virtues for a long time. For instance, Dartmouth professor Kenneth French studied various stock picking strategies in markets across the world and found that dividend stocks fared particularly well in Canada.

In one study Professor French sorted Canadian stocks by dividend yield at the end of December and put them into three portfolios. The first portfolio held the 30% of stocks with the highest yields and the second contained the 30% of stocks with the lowest yields. The final portfolio tracked stocks that didn't pay dividends. The portfolios were followed for a year and then the process was repeated. As a result, it was possible to calculate their returns over several decades.

The accompanying figure shows the growth of each portfolio along with that of the Canadian stock market. You'll notice that the high-yield stocks handily outperformed the market by an average of 4.0 percentage points a year from 1977 through to the end of 2015. The low-yield group underperformed by 0.5 of a percentage point annually over the same period.

But take a gander at the miserable returns generated by the no-dividend group, which trailed the market by an average of 7.2 percentage points a year from 1977 through 2015. While it had a strong run in the late 1970s, the group peaked in 1981, and then crashed. Shockingly, the non-dividend payers failed to fully recover during the decades since then.

Aside from strong past performance, focusing on dividends can lead to behavioural benefits for many investors. Think of it this way. Stock market crashes cause a great deal of stress, but dividend yields rise when stock prices fall. That tends to make them more attractive to dividend aficionados. As a result, they're more likely to load up - or at least stay invested - when prices are low.

Hunting For Dividends

When looking for good dividend stocks we evaluate each candidate based on its yield, reliability, and value. You can read about the process on page TK, but we boil everything down to an easy to use letter-grade that sums up a stock's investment potential.

Firms with the best prospects are awarded As and solid candidates get Bs. We think both are worthy of your consideration. Middle of the road firms get Cs while those in need of improvement get Ds or even Fs.

A select group of seven of stocks managed to earn As this year while 11 picked up solid Bs.

The All-Star Leaders

Three big banks got top marks last year and did so again this year. They are the Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), the Bank of Montreal (BMO), and TD Bank (TD), which offer yields of 4.2%, 4.0%, and 3.8% respectively. They are joined by CIBC (CM), which gained a grade level this year and provides a 4.7% yield.

All of the banks generate more income via their dividend yields than they offer on their 'high interest' savings accounts, albeit with more risk. After all, recent revelations of skulduggery in the nation's real estate sector should be of concern to bank shareholders. It's a big reason why wise investors diversify broadly.

Insurance firms Great-West Lifeco (GWO) and Sun Life Financial (SLF) made it to the top of the class again with yields of 4.4% and 3.9% respectively. The same is true of, Genworth MI Canada (MIC), which provides mortgage insurance and a hefty yield of 4.9%. Worries about the real estate market weigh on the stock, which trades at 9 times earnings and 88% of book value. A crash would put it to the test.

The B Team

Just a step behind, the B-list starts with Royal Bank (RY) and National Bank (NA) with yields of 4.1% and 4.7% respectively.

They're joined by insurance firms Industrial Alliance Insurance (IAG) and Manulife Financial (MFC). Both are returning B-graders as is asset manager IGM Financial (IGM), which offers the highest yield of the bunch at 6.2%.

Financial conglomerate Power Corporation of Canada (POW) rounds out the B-Team's list of financials. The firm slipped a grade point this year, but still provides a hefty 4.8% yield and trades near book value. It also owns stakes in highly-rated Great-West Lifeco, IGM Financial, and Power Financial.

The B-list continues with auto-parts firms Linamar (LNR) and Magna (MG), which offer relatively modest yields, strong dividend growth, and low price-to-earnings ratios of 7 and 8 respectively. Keeping with the transportation theme, WestJet (WJA) picked up a B and delivered top notch dividend growth over the last five years.

Electric utility Fortis (FTS) and Shaw Communications (SJR.B) round out the team. Fortis is a little expensive at 21 times earnings while Shaw is relatively cheap at just under 10 times earnings.

A Caveat

Use our grades as the starting point for your own research. Before buying any stock, make sure its situation hasn't changed in an important way and that it's right for your portfolio. Read the firm's latest press releases and regulatory filings. Scan newspaper stories to make sure you're aware of important developments and breaking news.

Look beyond the grades and think about the unique or intangible features of each company. Such factors can be beneficial, like a recent technological development. But they can also be detrimental, like the sudden arrival of new competition. Similarly, we're in an aging bull market, which means that you should be prepared for storm clouds on the horizon.

While we're pleased with our long-term track record, we can't guarantee that you'll make a fortune with every A- or B- rated stock. The market is just too wild and woolly for that. Nonetheless, we do think they deserve your attention and further research.

Dividend All-Stars
A Grade Stocks
Bank of Montreal (BMO)
Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS)
CIBC (CM)
Genworth MI Canada (MIC)
Great-West Lifeco (GWO)
Sun Life Financial (SLF)
TD Bank (TD)
B Grade Stocks
Fortis (FTS)
IGM Financial (IGM)
Industrial Alliance Insurance (IAG)
Linamar (LNR)
Magna International (MG)
Manulife Financial (MFC)
National Bank of Canada (NA)
Power Corp of Canada (POW)
Royal Bank of Canada (RY)
Shaw Communications (SJR.B)
WestJet Airlines (WJA)
As of September 1, 2016


  MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2018
 2 Stingy Stocks for 2017
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Old MS Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2018
 Cdn Top 200 2017
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 Cdn Top 200 2005
 US Top 500 2018
 US Top 500 2017
 US Top 500 2016
 US Top 500 2015
 US Top 500 2014
 US Top 500 2013
 US Top 500 2012
 US Top 500 2011
 US Top 500 2010
 US Top 500 2009
 US Top 500 2008
 US Top 500 2007
 US Top 1000 2006
 Dividends 100 2017
 Dividends 100 2016
 Retirement 100 2015
 Retirement 100 2014
 Retirement 100 2013
 Retirement 100 2012
 Retirement 100 2011
 Retirement 100 2010
 Income 100 2009
 Income 100 2008
 Income 100 2007
 Top Trusts 2006
 Top Trusts 2005
 Hot Potato
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Graham's prescription
 The case for optimism
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Small stocks, big profits
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 So easy, so profitable
 Dogs of the Dow
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

Tools:
 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table



 
About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...