Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
Selling Graham Stocks

I had the great pleasure of talking with many of you at the recent Canadian MoneySaver conference in Toronto. While discussing Graham's method for defensive investors, many people asked me how Graham went about selling such stocks. Regrettably, Graham didn't provide a clear selling strategy, but there are a few simple approaches that investors can use.

Before exploring a few ways to sell, it is useful to recall how Graham went about buying stocks. In brief, Graham wanted defensive investors to look for stocks with adequate size, sufficiently strong financial conditions, earnings stability, a long dividend record, moderate earnings growth, moderate price-to-earnings ratios and moderate price-tobook value ratios. The details can be found in chapter fourteen of Graham's book The Intelligent Investor (ISBN: 0060555661). In addition, my previous article called 'High Performance Graham Stocks', which appeared in the November/ December edition of the Canadian MoneySaver, contains more information about my slightly modified take on Graham's basic approach.

Back in October, my more lenient version of Graham's method yielded a list of only five U.S. stocks: Kellwood (KWD), Seaboard (SEB), SkyWest (SKYW), Steel Tech (STTX) and Thomas Industries (TII). When I ran the screen on March 11, 2005 the list was little changed, but Seaboard had been removed because its stock had climbed 77.2% higher.

If you follow my columns, you'll have noticed that I track the performance of all previous Graham stocks. Undoubtedly this decision has caused some confusion as to when one might want to sell.

By way of explanation, I decided to track all of the stocks in an effort to test one of David Dreman's more interesting findings. Dreman looked at the historical performance of stocks with low price-to-earnings ratios in his book Contrarian Investment Strategies: The Next Generation (ISBN: 0684813505). He calculated the performance of buying low price-to-earnings ratio stocks, holding them for a year, selling and then repeating the process. The annual performance advantage of buying low price-to-earnings ratio stocks versus the market average was 3.7 percentage points from 1970 to 1996. He also calculated the results of holding stocks for 2, 3, 5 and 8 years before selling and rebalancing the portfolio. The annual advantage of low price-to-earnings ratio stocks dropped a bit to 3.4, 3.1, 3.1 and 2.2 percentage points when the holding period was 2, 3, 5 and 8 years respectively.

Dreman's results show that value stocks can continue to provide a performance advantage for many years. In addition, holding for longer periods tends to reduce transaction costs and defers capital gains taxes. Because I like to keep costs to a minimum, I decided to track Graham stocks for many years to see if long holding periods continue to be profitable in practice.

Dreman's findings also suggest a few possible selling methods. For instance, you could sell each year and repurchase new stocks. With an annual turnover you might get a slight advantage but incur higher transaction costs. Alternately, you could wait longer to sell and rebalance. However, the simple approach of selling after a fixed number of years and buying new stocks runs into a problem. In some years Graham's method provides a very small list of stocks to choose from (only two in 2003). If you automatically sell every few years, you might not be able to buy a diversified selection of Graham stocks and you could wind up with an under-diversified and higher-risk portfolio.

Instead of a fixed time limit, Graham's moderate price-to-earnings and moderate price-to-book value criteria can be used to determine a high target. In his book, Graham suggested that defensive investors could be a little less strict and buy stocks with a price-to-earnings ratio times priceto- book value ratio of less than 22.5. This formula can be used to find the highest price at which defensive investors should buy a stock. You can turn the logic around and if a stock is no longer a buy then it might be sell.

The highest price at which Graham thought defensive investors should consider buying, or his high target, is found by taking the square root of the product of 22.5 times earnings- per-share times book-value per share. Formularically, the high target = the square root of (22.5 * EPS *BPS). For instance, Seaboard earns $133.93 per share and it has a book value of $551.92 per share. So, its high target would be the square root of (22.5 * $133.93 * $551.92) which is equal to $1,289.64. Similarly, Kellwood, SkyWest, Steel Tech and Thomas Industries would have high targets of $38.21, $20.71, $38.42 and $65.30 respectively. An advantage of the high limit approach is that the limit is dynamic and will change as earnings and book values change. A disadvantage of the approach is that you might be cutting profits short by selling at relatively low prices when the stock is on the cusp of being a buy. One could avoid this problem by raising the high target arbitrarily, say, by 20% or more.

To make matters even more complicated, Graham also suggested a simple selling method when discussing a lowdebt, low price-to-earnings approach in The Simplest Way to Select Bargain Stocks, which was republished in the book The Rediscovered Benjamin Graham (ISBN 0471244724). Here, he suggested selling after a price increase of 50% or after two calendar years, whichever came first. I expect to discuss this alternate method in more detail in a future article.

I've presented several possible selling methods for your consideration. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. You can decide for yourself which best suits your circumstances.

Date: Apr 2005

  MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table
 ETF Fee Calculator

About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...