Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
Focus on Fees

Investors track performance with an intensity that can cause them to overlook high fees. Most can save thousands of dollars a year by simply buying low-fee funds and trading infrequently.

Although it may seem strange, some investors don't realize that they pay an annual fee for their mutual funds. This fee is called the Management Expense Ratio (MER) and is detailed in a fund's prospectus. The MER is a percentage that is automatically removed from a fund's performance. So, if your fund's investments gained 10% last year and it charged a 2.5% MER then its reported return would have been 7.5%. In this way the fee is hidden in the fund's performance numbers.

The fees vary depending on fund type and may appear modest (See Table 1). However, due to the magic of compounding, these fees can take a big chunk out of your portfolio. Figure 1 shows the percentage of a portfolio that is consumed by fund fees assuming that the fund grows at 10% a year. In this case, after 25 years with a fund that charges 3% you would get half the profits and the fund the other half. Moving from percentage to dollar terms, Table 2 shows how much the investor pays for different MERs depending on the amount invested. A MER reduction of one percent can amount to thousands of dollars in annual savings for larger portfolios. For instance, if you have a portfolio worth $200,000 and reduce its MER from 3% to 2% you will save $2,000 in fees each year. Not only that, but after 25 years you will have kept about 65% of the gains instead of only 50%. As a result, it's prudent to weight both performance and fees equally when selecting funds.

Table 1: Average MER for various fund types
Fund Type Average MER
Canadian Equity 2.42%
U.S. Equity 2.54%
International Equity 2.54%
Specialty Equity 1.85%
Resource Equity 2.82%
Balanced / Asset Allocation2.42%
Dividend 2.17%
Mortgage 1.86%
Real Estate 2.63%
Canadian Bond 1.77%
Foreign Bond 2.01%
Canadian Money Market 1.12%
Foreign Money Market 1.51%

Figure 2

Table 2: Annual Fund Cost
  Management Expense Ratio (MER)
$50,000 $250$500$750$1,000$1,250$1,500

Another common investment mistake is trading too frequently. Each trade may incur a commission but more importantly causes gains to be taxed. Figure 2 shows the performance of three investors who pay 20% of any gains to the taxman. The "Buy-and-Hold" investor gains 10% annually and is taxed only in the last year. The "Yearly Trader" also gains 10% annually but pays taxes each year due to frequent trading. The difference between the two is noticeable. Over 25 years compounding helps the buy-and-hold investor to the tune of about 1% annually.

Figure 2

It also turns out that most investors are poor market timers. In the 1995 edition of The Journal of Portfolio Management, Stephen Nesbitt showed that fund investors lost about 1% a year by switching funds at the wrong time. I suspect that similar results hold for many stock pickers as well. The "Average Trader" in Figure 2 suffers from a 1% return reduction and only gains 9% annually. Of the three, the long-term buy-and-hold approach appears to be the most desirable on many fronts.

Combining a low fee approach with a buy-and-hold strategy can pay big dividends for most investors. Your should look for savings in your portfolio.

First published in April 2001.
  MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table
 ETF Fee Calculator

About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...