Stingy Investor Search - Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Links | SNW
 
10 Graham Picks for 2003

December is filled with family, friends, and, for investors, the dreams of healthy dividends. In what has become a December tradition, I look at Benjamin Graham's strategy for defensive investors using the MSN.com stock screener. Long-time Canadian MoneySaver readers will note that this is the third time I've discussed Graham's conservative technique.

Benjamin Graham first outlined his rules for defensive investors in The Intelligent Investor (ISBN 0060155477) which has been in bookstores for more than fifty years. I've breifly summarized Graham's time-tested rules in Figure 1. Usually few stocks meet Graham's stringent rules for earnings growth at a low price and his method often rejects all stocks as unsuitable. Rejection has certainly been the rule in recent times and the situation has not changed much this year despite overall market weakness.

Implementing Graham's rules can be tricky but the MSN.com screener does a reasonably good job of approximating them. The problem is that MSN.com's screener doesn't have the wealth of historical data needed to fully implement Graham's rules for defensive investors. For instance, the MSN.com database only contains five years of data on each stock and, as a result, I've trimmed down Graham's rules as shown in Figure 2. Even with these relaxed rules only nine stocks passed all the tests in 2000, five in 2001 and ten this year. To put this in perspective, there are currently over 6,900 stocks in the MSN.com database.

The nine picks of 2000 continued to do well with five in the plus column and four losing ground to date. The stock by stock breakdown is shown in Table 1 and the average gain for these stocks was very healthy at 35.86%. Given that the S&P500 fell by 33.85% over the same period, the Graham stocks managed a remarkable outperformance of 69.71% over two years. I should hasten to add, that outperforming the index by almost 70% should in no way be considered typical, or even expected.

It turns out that the five picks of 2001 also performed well with an average gain of 28.24%. Table 2 shows that the individual stocks gained between 8.67% and 56.51%. The S&P500, on the other hand, fell 16.05% over the same period, which translates into an outperformance of 44.29% from the 2001 Graham picks.

Clearly Graham's defensive approach has done quite well in the bear market. However, it has been my experience that periods of significant outperformance are often followed by periods of severe underperformance. Be warned that buying into a style that has recently done very well is no guarantee that it will continue to do well. Past performance is usually a poor indicator of future performance.

The current crop of Graham stocks is shown in Table 3. We all know that stocks can move very rapidly in today's volatile environment and I suggest using the MSN.com screener to be sure that the stocks in Table 3 still fit Graham's criteria.

http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/common/finderpro.asp

It is important to note that stock screeners can be deceptive at times because they aren't always up to date. For example, consider a company with steady earnings that suffers from some sudden calamity. Say its main manufacturing facility is demolished by a tornado. In this case, the stock may be labeled by the stock screener as good pick due to its recent quarterly numbers. However, the company's situation has clearly changed for the worse. In this way one often finds stocks that look good on the screener but aren't good for a portfolio. As a result, I often like to see some indication that a company's situation has remained largely unchanged before buying. Looking at recent news stories on the company can often help the investor avoid the stinkers. It is important to try to select stocks that are simply unloved and avoid those heading for the dumpster.

Looking at this year's crop of Graham stocks one quickly notices that many homebuilders and related companies fill the list. The dominance of this hot sector is particularly troubling. Granted, interest rates are at historic lows and first-time buyers are flooding the real estate market but many fear that another bubble is growing in real estate. If interest rates climb or the economy continues to weaken then the housing market could go from boom to bust and take this year's Graham stocks down significantly. Furthermore, these stocks are not suitable for all portfolios. Be sure to talk to your advisor before investing. Once again, buyer beware.

Figures & Tables

Figure 1: Benjamin Graham's Criteria for the Defensive Investor
P/E Ratio less than 15.
P/Book Ratio less than 1.5.
Book Value over 0.
Current Ratio over 2.
Earnings growth of 33% over 10 years.
Uninterrupted dividends over 20 years.
Some earnings in each of the past 10 years.
Annual revenue of more than $100 Million (1950).
Source: The Intelligent Investor (pages 184-185).


Figure 2: Screening criteria used to approximate Graham's rules
P/E Ratio less than 15.
P/Book Ratio less than 1.5.
Book Value more than 0.01.
Current Ratio more than 2 .
5 Year Earnings Growth more than 15%.
5 Year Dividend Growth more than 0%.
5 Year P/E Low more than 0.01.
1 Year Revenue more than $400 Million.


Table 1: Performance of the 2000 Picks (12/12/00 to 10/27/02)
Company2000 Price2002 PriceTotal Return
AAR Corp (AIR)$11.94$3.98-63.40%
Haverty Furniture (HVT)$10.06 $13.7039.76%
La-z-boy (LZB)$15.88$24.5258.50%
Rollins Truck (RLC)-bought out in 2001-82.00%
Reliance Steel (RS)$25.13 $20.65-16.16%
Tredegar Corp (TG)$15.56$12.25-19.47%
Thor Industries (THO)$19.69$34.12*247.38%
Wabash National (WNC)$7.81$4.65-38.80%
Watsco (WSO)$11.35 $14.8532.95%
Average Gain:+35.86%
S&P 500 (SPY):-33.85%
Source: quote.yahoo.com, * Adjusted for a 2-to-1 split


Table 2: Performance of the 2001 Picks (10/29/01 to 10/27/01)
Company2001 Price2002 PriceTotal Return
Centex (CTX)$39.45$46.4918.25%
Domtar (DTC)$8.19$9.6820.15%
Haverty Furniture (HVT)$12.80$13.708.67%
M.D.C. Holdings (MDC)$27.35$38.62*56.51%
Pulte Homes (PHM)$33.83$46.3937.60%
Average Gain:+28.24%
S&P 500 (SPY)-16.05%
Source: quote.yahoo.com, * Adjusted for an 11:10 split


Table 3: U.S. listed stocks that pass Graham's tests as of the close of 10/27/02 from www.msn.com
CompanyPrice ($)P/EP/E 5Year LowP/Book5Year EPS Growth (%)Current RatioDebt To Equity1Yr Revenue (M)5Year Dividend Growth (%)
Centex (CTX)46.38 7.0 4.1 1.30 22.88 5.8 2.59 8,021 5.43
Pulte Homes (PHM) 46.17 7.0 3.4 1.15 38.42 2.8 0.79 6,926 8.21
D.R. Horton (DHI) 20.16 7.2 3.6 1.39 32.19 7.0 1.38 6,084 46.45
Woodward Governor Company (WGOV) 36.62 7.3 5.2 1.17 26.99 2.3 0.22 703 12.87
M.D.C. Holdings (MDC) 37.91 7.3 2.6 1.41 39.79 2.7 0.24 2,224 18.90
Standard Pacific (SPF) 25.10 8.0 2.6 1.16 33.04 6.1 0.97 1,633 19.59
Seaboard (SEB) 207.00 8.9 2.2 0.57 9.84 2.2 0.42 1,821 5.70
Universal Forest Products (UFPI) 18.34 9.7 6.7 1.33 12.22 2.1 0.87 1,626 5.80
Haverty Furniture (HVT) 11.75 11.2 5.9 1.40 16.25 2.6 0.58 703 6.26
Watsco, Inc. (WSO) 14.25 14.0 9.8 1.18 5.73 3.6 0.30 1,188 2.25
CompanyPrice ($)P/EP/E 5Year LowP/Book5Year EPS Growth (%)Current RatioDebt To Equity1Yr Revenue (M)5Year Dividend Growth (%)


Additional Resources:

First published in the December 2002 edition of the Canadian MoneySaver magazine.

 
Globe & Mail Articles
 Portfolios

 Dividend All-Stars for 2024
 250 Megastars for 2024
 Extreme yields
 The easy way
 Smaller stable dividend
 250 Megastars for 2023
 Champagne portfolio
 Screaming Value
 Blended momentum
 Dividend monster
 Frugal dividend
 Stable dividend
 Speads and recessions
 TSX 60 for value investors
 Looking at 10-year returns
 Watching for a bottom
 Oh, bother!
 Low P/E DJIA
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2018
 2 Stingy Stocks for 2017
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Old MS Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2018
 Cdn Top 200 2017
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 Cdn Top 200 2005
 US Top 500 2018
 US Top 500 2017
 US Top 500 2016
 US Top 500 2015
 US Top 500 2014
 US Top 500 2013
 US Top 500 2012
 US Top 500 2011
 US Top 500 2010
 US Top 500 2009
 US Top 500 2008
 US Top 500 2007
 US Top 1000 2006
 Dividends 100 2017
 Dividends 100 2016
 Retirement 100 2015
 Retirement 100 2014
 Retirement 100 2013
 Retirement 100 2012
 Retirement 100 2011
 Retirement 100 2010
 Income 100 2009
 Income 100 2008
 Income 100 2007
 Top Trusts 2006
 Top Trusts 2005
 Hot Potato
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Graham's prescription
 The case for optimism
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Small stocks, big profits
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 So easy, so profitable
 Dogs of the Dow
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Flip Books



 
About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...