Stingy Investor The Rothery Report
Free Stingy News
Main Rothery Report News Articles Stocks DRPs Brokers Links Free Newsletters
Rothery Report: Login Learn More Performance Sample Subscribe Contact Us
 
MoneySaver Articles
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing
 Eye on PI

MoneySense Articles
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks








SPPs for the Long Term

Share Purchase Plans (SPPs) are a great way to buy blue-chip stocks without paying big commissions. They also encourage long-term thinking and curb the urge to trade. As shown in Table 1, there are only a limited number of SPPs available in Canada. Selecting which SPP to invest in can be a daunting process.

Table 1: SPPs by Industry
Industrials
MCLBusiness Forms
DFSSteel
IPSSteel
Utilities
FTS Electrical
TAElectrical
TRPGas Pipeline
WGas Pipeline
BCGGas Utility
ENBOil Pipeline
AITTelephone
BCETelephone
NTTelecommunications
TTelephone
Financial Services
BMOBank
BNSBank
CMBank
NABank
Oil & Gas
AECOil and Gas Producers
IMOIntegrated Oil
SUIntegrated Oils
Minerals
AGEPrecious Metals
ALIntegrated Mines
NIntegrated Mines
Consumer Products
DCXAutos
MOL.ABreweries
Other
MDSMedical Services
EMAConglomerate
CPConglomerate

I believe that earnings stability and growth are two of the most important factors to consider. After all, in the long run, investors will reap rewards proportional to those earned by their companies. With this in mind, I decided to discard any SPP stock that suffered an annual loss in the last ten years. A bit draconian perhaps, but, in this regard, I like to follow Warren Buffett's rules:

"Rule 1: Never Lose Money
Rule 2: Never forget Rule 1"

I naturally expect the same of the companies I invest in.

Of the universe of 28 SPP stocks, only 9 have avoided taking a loss in the last ten years. The earnings history of this select group is shown in Table 2. Three stocks (AIT, EMA & T) were removed because they didn't report (or have) 10 years of earnings data. EMA was privatized seven years ago, and the others are the result of recent mergers.

Table 2: The Earnings Record (EPS, diluted if available)
Symbol 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
AEC 0.72 0.12 0.53 1.21 1.34 1.44 0.65 1.73 0.21 1.26  
BCG 1.16 1.73 0.35 1.43 0.93 1.16 2.53 1.27 1.85 2.12  
BMO 2.10 2.31 2.36 2.55 2.97 3.38 4.13 4.62 4.66 4.72 6.56
BNS 1.16 1.40 1.47 1.49 0.88 1.69 2.04 2.95 2.64 2.93 3.62
ENB 1.82 4.25 0.95 1.02 0.55 1.15 1.45 1.58 1.66 1.91 2.54
FTS 2.46 2.41 2.55 2.56 2.46 2.53 2.36 2.38 2.12 2.24  
IMO 0.45 0.30 0.35 0.48 0.62 0.89 1.49 1.83 1.26 1.35  
MDS 0.18 0.22 0.34 0.01 0.32 0.34 0.46 0.56 0.39 0.70 0.86
TA 0.26 1.12 1.18 1.16 1.18 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.31 1.10  
Source: Annual Reports (www.sedar.com)

After earnings stability, I look for earnings growth. After all, a 5.4% bond (compounded annually) produces 52% growth over 8 years. Any business worth its salt should be able to do better. To calculate long-term growth, I start by averaging the first three years of earnings-per-share data (1990-1992) and then the most recent three years of data (1997-1999 or 1998-2000). Growth is then determined by dividing the recent average by the 1990-1992 average. This procedure minimizes the effect of an exceptional year skewing the results and the results are presented in Table 3. Only 6 of the 9 remaining stocks achieved more than 52% growth.

Table 3: Long Term Earnings Growth
Symbol Growth
IMO 303%
MDS 164%
BMO 135%
AEC 134%
BNS 128%
BCG 62%
TA 39%
FTS -9%
ENB -13%

Having reduced the initial list of 28 SPP stocks to 6, it's time to check how expensive they are (See Table 4). For this purpose, I like to focus on the earnings-to-price ratio, which is also known as earnings yield. Stocks should only be considered if they have an earnings yield that is more than the yield of a 10-year government bond (near 5.4%). After all, the return from stocks is riskier than that from bonds, and investors should rightly demand a premium. This leaves five candidates: AEC, BCG, BMO, BNS and IMO. All have shown growth, stability in earnings, and seem reasonably priced on an earnings-yield basis. Will they outperform in the long run? I can't say for sure, but the outlook appears quite promising.

Table 4: Valuation
Symbol P/E Earnings Yield
IMO 10.9 9.2%
MDS 30.2 3.3%
BMO 13.1 7.6%
AEC 17.8 5.6%
BNS 12.3 8.1%
BCG 11.7 8.5%
Source: www.globeinvestor.com (February 10 2001)

Unfortunately, a portfolio composed of five stocks doesn't provide the investor with adequate diversification, but this problem can be overcome by moving beyond SPP eligible stocks. In my view, it is more important to select good long-term stocks than poor stocks that have a SPP. The patient investor may also consider setting some money aside and waiting for the regulations to change. As Dale Ennis has reported, the OSC will hopefully allow for a proliferation of SPP plans in Canada. Such a change would allow investors to both save on fees and receive the benefit of a broader selection.

First published in March 2001.
 

About Legal Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment advisor before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...