Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
High Performance Graham Stocks

Over the past four years I've used Benjamin Graham's time-tested strategy for defensive investors to uncover undervalued U.S. stocks. In many ways my series on Graham stocks was well timed because, after years of underperformance in the late 1990s, value stocks staged a strong comeback in the early 2000s. Graham's approach has certainly benefited from changed market sentiment and I'm happy to report another year of stellar returns.

Benjamin Graham first outlined his rules for defensive investors in The Intelligent Investor which has been in bookstores for more than fifty years. An updated edition of The Intelligent Investor (ISBN 0060555661) was released last year with new commentary from veteran Money Magazine columnist Jason Zweig. I had the pleasure of reading the new edition this summer and my initial fear that Graham's original text would be corrupted by Zweig's commentary was unfounded. The original text is presented in its entirety with Zweig's commentary provided in footnotes and at the end of each chapter. Overall, the new commentary is properly placed and provides interesting modern examples based largely on Graham's principles. All told, I was pleased with my purchase of the newest version of The Intelligent Investor.

I've summarized Graham's rules for defensive investors in Figure 1 with one omission. When testing for financial stability, Graham imposed a current ratio requirement and he also wanted stocks with long-term debt less than net current assets (current assets less current liabilities). He modified this rule for utilities where he wanted debt to be less than double shareholder's equity. In the past I've neglected to include this criteria but I hope that you'll forgive my oversight. Keep in mind that searching for stocks using Graham's original criteria is often fruitless because his criteria are very strict.

Figure 1: Benjamin Graham's Criteria for the Defensive Investor
P/E Ratio less than 15.
P/Book Ratio less than 1.5.
Book Value over 0.
Current Ratio over 2.
Earnings growth of 33% over 10 years.
Uninterrupted dividends over 20 years.
Some earnings in each of the past 10 years.
Annual revenue of more than $100 Million (1950).
Source: The Intelligent Investor, 4th Revised Edition (pages 184-185).


To implement my less-stringent version of Graham's rules I continue to use the MSN.com stock screener. The MSN.com screener doesn't have the wealth of historical data needed to fully implement Graham's rules and, as a result, I trimmed down Graham's rules to those shown in Figure 2. Even with these relaxed rules, only nine stocks met my criteria in 2000, five in 2001, ten in 2002, and two in 2003. This year the selection is a bit better with five stocks passing the test. Keep in mind that there are over 6,750 stocks in the MSN.com database which makes the five Graham stocks quite unusual.

Figure 2: Screening criteria used to approximate Graham's rules
P/E Ratio less than 15.
P/Book Ratio less than 1.5.
Book Value more than 0.01.
Current Ratio more than 2.
Annual EPS Growth (5 Yr Avg) more than 2.9186%.
5 Year Dividend Growth more than 0%.
5 Year P/E Low more than 0.01.
1 Year Revenue more than $400 Million.


The nine picks of 2000 continue to do quite well with all nine showing profits. A stock by stock breakdown is shown in Table 1 and the average gain is very healthy at 123.0%. Given that the S&P500 fell by 14.8% over the same period, the Graham stocks managed a remarkable outperformance of 137.8 percentage points over four years.

Table 1: Performance of previous Graham Picks (September 28 2004)
StockGain
2000 Graham Stocks (12/12/2000)
AAR Corp (AIR) 3.8%
Haverty Furniture (HVT) 76.1%
La-z-boy (LZB) 4.7%
Rollins Truck (RLC) 82.0%
Reliance Steel (RS) 62.4%
Tredegar Corp (TG) 14.1%
Thor Industries (THO) 431.6%
Wabash National (WNC) 246.2%
Watsco (WSO) 186.1%
Average Gain 123.0%
S&P500 (SPY) -14.8%
2001 Graham Stocks (10/29/2001)
Centex (CTX) 170.2%
Domtar (DTC) 57.4%
Haverty Furniture (HVT) 36.8%
M.D.C. Holdings (MDC) 261.7%
Pulte Homes (PHM) 261.5%
Average Gain 157.5%
S&P500 (SPY) 8.1%
2002 Graham Stocks (10/27/2002)
Centex (CTX) 145.5%
Pulte Homes (PHM) 164.6%
D.R. Horton (DHI) 149.1%
Woodward Governor Company (WGOV) 78.0%
M.D.C. Holdings (MDC) 137.0%
Standard Pacific (SPF) 124.5%
Seaboard (SEB) 178.3%
Universal Forest Products (UFPI) 82.2%
Haverty Furniture (HVT) 47.6%
Watsco, Inc. (WSO) 105.2%
Average Gain 121.2%
S&P500 (SPY) 27.4%
2003 Graham Stocks (10/3/2003)
Pulte Homes (PHM) 64.0%
Ameron Int. (AMN) 0.4%
Average Gain 32.2%
S&P500 (SPY) 9.4%
Source: quote.yahoo.com


The five picks of 2001 can boast even better performance with an average gain of 157.5%. Table 1 shows that the worst individual performer from 2001 gained over 36% and the best performer gained 261.7%. Again the index fell behind with the S&P500 climbing only 8.1% over the same period which translates into a superior outperformance of 149.4 percentage points for the 2001 Graham stocks.

2002's picks were also strong with an average gain of 121.2% and individual stocks gaining between 47.6% and 178.3%. Since 2002 the S&P500 trailed the Graham stocks by 93.8 percentage points but managed reasonable gains of 27.4% over the same period.

Last year only two stocks passed Graham's tests but they managed an average gain of 32.2% which is 22.8 percentage points more than the S&P500 which gained 9.4% over the same period.

Clearly Graham's defensive approach has done more than well but such extraordinary results are unlikely to continue. It has been my experience that periods of significant outperformance are usually followed by periods of severe underperformance. Be warned that buying into a style that has recently done well is no guarantee that it will continue to do well. Mind you, I've also been making this warning for years and it has yet to come true. However, it is important to err on the side of prudence and not to become overly enchanted by outsized gains.

This year's crop of Graham stocks is shown in Table 2. Since stocks can move rapidly, I suggest checking the MSN.com screener to be sure that the stocks in Table 2 continue to fit Graham's criteria.

http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/common/finderpro.asp

Table 2: U.S. listed stocks that pass Graham's tests as of the close of September 28 2004 from www.msn.com
Company Name Price ($) P/E P/E: 5-Yr Low P/Book Annual EPS Growth (%) Current Ratio Debt to Equity 1-Yr Revenue ($M) 5-Yr Dividend Growth (%)
Kellwood (KWD) 36.66 12.7 5.4 1.44 39.18 3.2 0.68 2,406 3.06
Seaboard (SEB) 570.00 8.1 2.2 1.31 64.58 2.1 0.50 2,362 25.60
SkyWest (SKYW) 14.37 10.3 7.5 1.07 3.84 4.3 0.64 989 4.03
Steel Tech (STTX) 25.72 11.5 4.4 1.43 8.51 2.8 0.50 675 13.94
Thomas Ind (TII) 31.00 13.6 9.1 1.33 5.97 2.60.26 401 4.01


Also be aware that stock screeners can be deceptive at times because they aren't always up to date. For example, if a company runs into trouble then its stock may continue to be highlighted by the screener as good pick based on old data. I often find stocks that look good to a stock screener but aren't good for a portfolio. It is also a good idea to look for some indication that a company's situation has remained largely unchanged before buying. For instance, looking at recent news stories on the company often helps to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Naturally, you should examine any stock in detail before investing and holding only five stocks is not recommended. Be cautious before jumping into any investment and talk over potential purchases with your investment advisor. Furthermore, deep value picks can be psychologically difficult for many investors and a few beaten-up stocks inevitably fail. Thus far, Graham's method has avoided running into a land mine but it is only a matter of time. I'm particularly concerned that some people might be inclined to chase after performance and won't fully realize what they are getting into. Be sure to know what you're investing in and proceed with caution.

Additional Resources:

First published in the November 2004 edition of the Canadian MoneySaver magazine.

  MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

Tools:
 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table
 ETF Fee Calculator



 
About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...