Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
Share Purchase Plans for 2005

The long-term risk-averse investor should consider three factors when selecting stocks with Share Purchase Plans (SPP). First, they should demand a low price. Second, they should require earnings stability. Finally, investors should look for modest, but not necessarily spectacular, earnings growth. I've used these three criteria to find interesting stocks for Canadian MoneySaver readers in 2001 and 2003. In this article, I take a look at the performance of my past picks and provide a new list of SPP stocks to consider.

The five SPP stocks of 2001 were Imperial Oil (IMO), The Bank on Montreal (BMO), The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), Alberta Energy Corporation (AEC) and B.C. Gas (BCG). 2001's stocks managed to handily outperform the market from February 15 2001 to February 4 2003 with capital gains averaging 13.5% versus a decline of 29.7% [Corrected from a decline of 14.0%] for the S&P/TSX60 index (as represented by the iUnits exchange-traded fund (XIU)).

The eight SPP stocks of 2003 are shown in Table 1 and were Imperial Oil (IMO), Suncor (SU), Scotiabank (BNS), Enbridge (ENB), BCE Inc (BCE), BC Gas (BCG) which is now Terasen (TER), National Bank (NA) and the Bank of Montreal (BMO). These eight stocks outperformed from February 4, 2003 to May 11, 2005 with average capital gains of 54.3% versus 43.3% for the S&P/TSX60 index.

Table 1: Performance of 2003's SPP stocks
CompanyPrice Feb 4, 2003Price May 11, 2005Capital Gain
Imperial Oil (IMO) $45.40 $86.49 90.5%
Suncor (SU) $25.92 $48.10 85.6%
Scotiabank (BNS)* $25.35* $39.82 57.1%
Enbridge (ENB) $41.55 $66.20 59.3%
BCE Inc (BCE) $28.75 $28.95 0.7%
Terasen (TER)** $19.80** $27.75 40.2
National Bank (NA) $32.00 $52.42 63.8%
Bank of Montreal (BMO) $40.88 $56.20 37.5%
Average 54.3%
S&P/TSX 60 (XIU) 43.3%
Source:, * Split 2-for-1, ** Name changed and split 2-for-1

Since 2001 the SPP stocks have gained 75.1% or 74.3 percentage points more than the 0.8% capital gain of the S&P/TSX60 index [Corrected from 51.9 percentage points more than the 23.2% capital gain of the S&P/TSX60 index].

There are currently twenty-three companies that offer Share Purchase Plans to Canadians. Two of the twenty-three are closed-end funds which Iíve excluded in an effort to stick to regular common stocks.

I first look for low prices and good relative value can be obtained by selecting stocks with high earnings yields (or high earnings-to-price ratios). Conservative investors should look for stocks with an earnings yield that is higher than the yield of long-term government bonds (near 4.58%). After all, stocks are riskier than bonds and investors should rightly demand a premium for the extra risk.

Given the parsimonious yield on government bonds, Iím also reminded of Benjamin Grahamís advice to avoid stocks with price-to-earnings ratios of more than 20 (or earnings yields of less than 5%). Iíll take Grahamís conservative advice to heart and cut out stocks with earnings yields of less than 5% which is a slightly higher hurdle than 4.58%. Seven of the twenty-one SPP stocks fail to pass the 5% bar and are excluded.

The next factor that I consider is earnings stability. Here the annual earnings-per-share history of each company is examined and stocks that suffer from losses in any annual period are discarded. It turns out that of the fourteen remaining SPP companies only one failed the earnings stability test.

Modest growth is next on my list. After all, 5% annualized growth provides a gain of about 41% over seven years and any business worth its salt should be able to do better. To determine earnings growth I start with the last ten years of annual earnings-per-share history. I then average the first three years of earnings data and then average the most recent three years of data. Growth is then found by dividing the recent average by the past average. This procedure helps to reduce the impact of an exceptional year on the calculated growth rate. In the end, seven of the remaining stocks managed to achieve a long-term earnings growth rate of more 41%.

The seven SPP companies that pass all three tests are shown in Table 2. Iíve also provided each stockís price-per-share, 7-year earnings-per-share growth, earnings yield, and Standard & Poorís debt rating. All of these stocks have investment grade debt ratings and, as a result, are relatively safe.

Table 2: 2005ís SPPs for long-term investors
Company Name Price Earnings Growth* Earnings Yield Debt Rating
Imperial Oil (IMO) $87.64 234% 6.2% AAA
Bank Nova Scotia (BNS) $40.04 138% 7.1% AA-
Enbridge (ENB)** $66.25 120% 5.1% A-
National Bank (NA) $52.65 100% 7.9% A
Bank Of Montreal (BMO) $56.28 78% 8.1% AA-
Fortis (FTS)*** $73.00 69% 5.7% BBB+
Dofasco (DFS) $33.85 61% 15.4% A-
Sources: Thomson Baseline,,, May 10 2005,
* Not annualized,
** To be split 2-for-1,
*** Fortis (FTS) split its stock 4-for-1, October 2005.

A portfolio of seven stocks does not provide adequate diversification but this problem can be overcome by moving beyond SPP eligible stocks. In my view, it is more important to select good long-term stocks than to stick with poor stocks just because they have share purchase plans.

Be sure to use my SPP list as a starting point and dig further to make sure that a particular stock is right for you. Although Iím hopeful that my approach will continue to perform well, strong performance can not be guaranteed.

To round out this month's article, I've a few special requests. If you particularly like one of my stock screening methods then let me know and I'll endeavor to provide more frequent updates. I'm also looking forward to a little summer reading. If you can recommend a good business book, send your recommendation to

Additional Resources:

+ SPPs for the Long Term
+ Share Purchase Plans for 2003

Date: June 2005


*** Fortis (FTS) split its stock 4-for-1, October 2005.

Corrections made to XIU capital gains as noted in the text in [ ]

It looks like I goofed up and calculated previous performance to May 11 but put this year's start at May 10. This makes it hard to chain performance figures together. As a result, I'll use May 11 as the start of 2005's list and not May 10. Thankfully, stock prices didn't change much on average (less than 0.6%) between May 10 and 11 of 2005.

  MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table
 ETF Fee Calculator

About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...